<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can&#8217;t focus on fog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://productvision.org/blog/focus-on-fog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://productvision.org/blog/focus-on-fog/</link>
	<description>Articles about Product Vision and Strategy by D. Philip Haine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Haine</title>
		<link>http://productvision.org/blog/focus-on-fog/comment-page-1/#comment-5413</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Haine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productvision.org/blog/?p=494#comment-5413</guid>
		<description>Steve, I think you are right that she is trying to focus everyone on the users again, and not on petty in-fighting. Still, that&#039;s a pretty low bar.

And what here is labeled a &quot;mission&quot; is way too vague to actually be of much use in guiding direction.  ALL products have to fit into their customers&#039; lives.  And they should ALL work, and be great, and be dependable and trustworthy.  

Now... what are we supposed to build again?  And where are we going strategically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I think you are right that she is trying to focus everyone on the users again, and not on petty in-fighting. Still, that&#8217;s a pretty low bar.</p>
<p>And what here is labeled a &#8220;mission&#8221; is way too vague to actually be of much use in guiding direction.  ALL products have to fit into their customers&#8217; lives.  And they should ALL work, and be great, and be dependable and trustworthy.  </p>
<p>Now&#8230; what are we supposed to build again?  And where are we going strategically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://productvision.org/blog/focus-on-fog/comment-page-1/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://productvision.org/blog/?p=494#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>Hmm - I think this is a remarkable statement, since most companies focus on things like: Our Mission Is To Create A Great Search Outcome (no offense to the actual firm that I adapted this from) and sometimes, SOMETIMES, that leads itself to a inward-looking focus, and a ridiculous set of lingo around &quot;the consumer&quot; in a way that doesn&#039;t map to any real person. (ahem). By characterizing customers as real people that just want to get through their day (a bit bleak, but still), there&#039;s a sense there of hey, our stuff has to fit into THEIR lives. Their lives aren&#039;t about our internal workings or money or brands, it&#039;s about their lives. That&#039;s a huge cultural leap for any Silicon Valley company, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8211; I think this is a remarkable statement, since most companies focus on things like: Our Mission Is To Create A Great Search Outcome (no offense to the actual firm that I adapted this from) and sometimes, SOMETIMES, that leads itself to a inward-looking focus, and a ridiculous set of lingo around &#8220;the consumer&#8221; in a way that doesn&#8217;t map to any real person. (ahem). By characterizing customers as real people that just want to get through their day (a bit bleak, but still), there&#8217;s a sense there of hey, our stuff has to fit into THEIR lives. Their lives aren&#8217;t about our internal workings or money or brands, it&#8217;s about their lives. That&#8217;s a huge cultural leap for any Silicon Valley company, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

